2010-01-03, 04:27 AM
Yes, you did do that on IRC, and then you left immediately. I couldn't even talk with you.
For the record, what Swerve wanted was not a good idea. He wanted a democratic system for bannings, and as with Flugzeug, democratic infraction systems don't work on a forum as there's too much bickering. So yes, he wanted a change to the moderation system, but definitely not the changes that I put in place. You're grasping at straws here and painting me to look like something I'm not and that bothers me.
Definitely a straw man here. You're building up this argument about what I said ("don't be yourself", which isn't even close to what I said) and then attacking it. What I'm saying is that if you don't want to be banned, don't create situations where you could be banned. Simple as that.
For the record, what Swerve wanted was not a good idea. He wanted a democratic system for bannings, and as with Flugzeug, democratic infraction systems don't work on a forum as there's too much bickering. So yes, he wanted a change to the moderation system, but definitely not the changes that I put in place. You're grasping at straws here and painting me to look like something I'm not and that bothers me.
BombsAway Wrote:But it's a real shame that you think it's okay for your members to feel like they can't speak their mind. That's the message I'm getting from the end of that paragraph. Don't push the issue to me sounds like don't be yourself. I don't push any single issue on the forums, all of my warnings have been single instances. So I don't see any other way that I should take that.
Definitely a straw man here. You're building up this argument about what I said ("don't be yourself", which isn't even close to what I said) and then attacking it. What I'm saying is that if you don't want to be banned, don't create situations where you could be banned. Simple as that.