2009-12-07, 08:28 PM
Okay, so, we're going to do this debate, and we're supposed to be advisors of President Roosevelt. We're arguing whether or not the U.S. should have an Isolationist (no connections at all to WWII), Neutrality (meaning you can still trade with the countries at war), or an Interventionist (let's go to war!) policy.
....I got the short end of the straw. I'm on the Isolationist side.
I really have no arguments. All I can think of are
-War will cause unnecessary war and deaths (easily reputable, since Hitler would probably cause the deaths of over 11 million people anyways).
-We do not need to ration our food if we stay out of the war....kinda arguable, but WWII would probably bring everyone jobs.
-Europe won't pay back their debts like WWI. Closest thing to a good argument I could thing of.
_____________________________________
Any thoughts?
....I got the short end of the straw. I'm on the Isolationist side.
I really have no arguments. All I can think of are
-War will cause unnecessary war and deaths (easily reputable, since Hitler would probably cause the deaths of over 11 million people anyways).
-We do not need to ration our food if we stay out of the war....kinda arguable, but WWII would probably bring everyone jobs.
-Europe won't pay back their debts like WWI. Closest thing to a good argument I could thing of.
_____________________________________
Any thoughts?