Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is there conclusive evidence?
#5
 Spoiler

Reversing the formula, we get that he has
(855 *4,0 + 51) * 194 / 100 = 6733
watt = 673300/(855 *4,0 + 51) = 193,9786 -> 194 atk

Add in the 2 % bonus from mw and we get 870 str and 51 dex. Now, add in the 12 attack pot bonus:

(870 * 4,0 + 51) * 206/100 = 7273,86 attack

Assume multiplier last. Then, the max attack he'll be able to deal is equal to

(7273,86 - def * 0,5) * 1,4 * 1,5 * 5,5

Skeleosaurus has 810 wdef. Then
(7273,86 - 405) * 1,4 * 1,5 * 5,5 = 79335,333 max

Now, assume mults first:

(7273,86 * 1,4 * 1,5 - 405) * 5,5 = 81785,583 max

We see that multipliers first is the only possible option.

To prove it for other multipliers, use that method.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-03, 11:49 AM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Kalovale - 2009-12-03, 12:08 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-03, 12:30 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Kalovale - 2009-12-03, 12:32 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Nikkey - 2009-12-03, 01:30 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Stereo - 2009-12-03, 06:34 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-03, 10:47 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Stereo - 2009-12-04, 12:06 AM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-04, 12:05 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Nikkey - 2009-12-04, 01:10 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-04, 09:19 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by StringStrider - 2009-12-05, 01:52 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Kalovale - 2009-12-05, 01:56 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Senyain - 2009-12-05, 04:07 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Stereo - 2009-12-05, 05:27 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by ImagineAll - 2009-12-05, 07:11 PM
Is there conclusive evidence? - by Cancambo - 2009-12-05, 07:16 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)