Russt Wrote:Oh but you also can't separate log(1+-sqrt(21)) into log(1) +- log(sqrt(21)). heh.
And since log of a negative number is complex, the only real solution would be n = log2(1 + sqrt(21)) = ln(1 + sqrt(21))/ln(2) =~ 1.481
That certainly is correct. I was thinking about it at university when I had my math-class. I don't understand how I manage to do the same math-error twice, but oh well.
[IMGspoiler]http://i36.tinypic.com/33ljl0k.jpg[/IMGspoiler]
Anywho, for those who are interested in the
![[Image: y8ad8nd.png]](http://mathurl.com/y8ad8nd.png)
answer: Do the following:
Set
![[Image: yz66355.png]](http://mathurl.com/yz66355.png)
First off, prove that there exist a real answer (A prof. and I discussed the topic, and we got off to imaginary numbers. Yehaw.):
As
![[Image: yea2tvl.png]](http://mathurl.com/yea2tvl.png)
is true for all real a, the function is continuous. (Or use Cauchy, if you're that unsure that this is a continuous function)
Set n=1, then f(n) = 0. If we set n = 2, then
![[Image: yhrwqne.png]](http://mathurl.com/yhrwqne.png)
Therefore, there is a root 1<n<2 such that f(n) = 5.
To find the exact answer, you can turn it to a series expansion or repeat Newton's method infinitely many times (Well...).
Noah

