Kitteh Wrote:My maxed-out Stance laughs at your 90% rate.
Or it would if it could actually stay in place for more than 5 seconds.
90% is good enough for a skill like MB since it doesn't activate unless you want it to anyway and normal whacking isn't that bad. Against weak monsters I'll run up and purposely melee them to activate a MB sometimes.
Stereo Wrote:Warrior primary stats are str/acc though, so low-dex is having less base acc than you need to hit anything if you want to put it that way. There's no real equivalent to "dexless" since you can't hunt monsters that require 0 acc, unless you just say that having the least possible base dex make you dexless.
I still think it makes more sense to just use "low-dex" when you have more than the minimum, and "dexless" when you have the minimum AP in dex.
This whole discussion is way off-topic, but I feel like putting my two cents in.
Although that's still the most commonly accepted standpoint, I think that's an outdated way to look at things. There is no advantage to having more than 4 base dex as a Warrior these days. Therefore, "normal dex" is not an accepted build, but rather it just means you're adding AP to dex to compensate for not having good enough accuracy gear. There is no defined standard normal dex.
For archers/thieves/pirates, there are only two real acceptable standard builds. The "normal" build and the "statless" build. I don't think people should make such a big deal out of exactly how much base stat they have. Having a distinction between being "dexless" (as in using Maple Weapons or other weapons with no stat req) and "normal" (using regular high level weapons and using gear for both your primary and secondary stat) is important because they are two entirely different strategies for raising your damage. Caring whether someone has fully maxed out their primary stat to its greatest potential or not is not important. A 20 dex Equinox user is no different from a 21 dex Equinox user.