2009-10-25, 01:18 AM
I don't mean to throw you to the ground more than the next guy but the theory itself is kind of uneducated.
Facts are presented not to just say it is fact but for you to test it out yourself, to use the resources that deemed it fact. In a court case you don't say 'fingerprints' are facts and they take you for granted for it. It's because they are imprints of a person. You can test for yourself a fingerprint is different from you or I which is a fact. Thing support it as every human is different, is that not a fact?
The sun is hot, it burns us a billion miles away, are you going to say that if we do not get closer it won't?
Actually theres nothing more to say. A fact is simply starts out as a hypothesis that is tested thoroughly before being thrown around as a fact. Misconstruing a fact can be corrected by simply going to the original source.
Facts are presented not to just say it is fact but for you to test it out yourself, to use the resources that deemed it fact. In a court case you don't say 'fingerprints' are facts and they take you for granted for it. It's because they are imprints of a person. You can test for yourself a fingerprint is different from you or I which is a fact. Thing support it as every human is different, is that not a fact?
The sun is hot, it burns us a billion miles away, are you going to say that if we do not get closer it won't?
Actually theres nothing more to say. A fact is simply starts out as a hypothesis that is tested thoroughly before being thrown around as a fact. Misconstruing a fact can be corrected by simply going to the original source.