Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Normal Luk Versus Lukless; When do they surpass?
#19
I don't think there is ever a time when Luk is better than lukless. Because of the way that the formula works, luk dosn't contribute to damage at all if I remember right. So the only advantage that luk mages have is that they can equip higher level armor. But that armor hadly contribuites anything to damage. If higher level armor gave better stats, it might be worth it to have a luk mage. Or if we didn't have lukless weapons, its espaccially going to be bad when the high level lukless elemental staffs come out.

I wish afrobean were here, I know he has crunched a lot of numbers in reguards to things like this, and his opinions are usually worthwhile to hear.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Normal Luk Versus Lukless; When do they surpass? - by White Adapt - 2008-07-03, 08:35 PM
Normal Luk Versus Lukless; When do they surpass? - by Harrisonized - 2008-07-12, 02:41 AM
Normal Luk Versus Lukless; When do they surpass? - by Harrisonized - 2008-08-04, 03:54 AM
Normal Luk Versus Lukless; When do they surpass? - by Harrisonized - 2008-08-06, 06:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)