2009-09-09, 03:31 AM
Retalion Wrote:Iono, I see two sides here:
On one hand, why would someone do this for laughs and giggles? It seems a pointless thing to post. This reminds me of the thread a while ago about maker'd items having negative stats. Like, I really dont see why someone would lie about this, but this brings it to the other side:
You'd think that with maker out for almost a month now, SOMEONE ELSE would've had this happen to them. I mean... just looking on SouthPerry, thousands of items have been maker'd, and NONE of them have ever ended up with missing slots. IF this was indeed true, then the chances are 0.00001% or even something ridiculously lower. It just seems VERY unlikely.
As much as I would like to believe you, something just doesnt feel right, no offense. To my knowledge, upgrade slots dont go missing like that. I mean, alternatively, if it could "lose" 2 slots, it could also "gain" 2 slots, no?
On yet another angle, at the people asking for proof, the surprise would be if it DID exist. This is an unprecedented event (as far as we know, this is the first time it's happened), its not like people frap everything they maker going "hey, maybe this time, my item will turn out with 2 fewer upgrade slots! lets screenshot everything JUST in case!". Yes, some people document EVERYTHING they do, but most dont...the thread starter had no way of knowing this would happen, so why would they think about taking screenshots beforehand? The best she could provide is a screenshot of the maker picture after and the maker'd shoe. Yes, there's plenty of room for bsing, but she's trying her best to prove her point here, give her a break.
It could be a conflict with the vicious hammer. Sure thousands of people have maker'd items but how many have been made since vicious hammer was released? How many people have made this particular item?
I am terribly cynical but I doubt she's lying about this.