Abortion

law is not science, sadly law makers can do and say whatever crap they want. it wont affect what life is. FYI i am a biologist so i am not some random child, i actually know what i am talking about

and i can quote wiki too.



as you can see from the definition of life a fecundated ovule fulfills all of the required characteristics. you been schooled.

next comic please.

A fetus is not not human life, it is potential human life.
Until a fetus can live outside of the mother's womb, or similar machines, it is not a human, but rather part of the woman. There's no laws against cutting off my own thumb, so why would there be laws against removing part of a woman's body, since it can't live on it's own out side of the body.

A debate about when life is defined could go on for a while, so let's skip that.
Various groups view the time when 'life' is present differently, but since a majority of people advocating Life at conception lack any education or scientific evidence to support their claims, the legal cut off is set back to a point most people can agree when life is present.
No one is forcing you to have an abortion before that. If you have reason to not have one after conception, then you have the right to not have an abortion. You don't have the right to tell others your definition of life is the one and true definition, and that they have to obey your moral standards.

You control/have rights over your body, not your neighbors, not your daughters, not your friends. Yours. No one else's.