2009-08-10, 11:46 PM
Does proving people on basil with wrong ideas and assumptions about the differing mage classes wrong count as "arguing"?
I.E.: "F/ps are better than I/l's solely because they can mist stronger monsters after TT"
Not saying F/ps are inferior or anything...but that's a really dumb reason.
I.E.: "F/ps are better than I/l's solely because they can mist stronger monsters after TT"
Not saying F/ps are inferior or anything...but that's a really dumb reason.

