2009-07-31, 12:33 AM
Freenhult Wrote:If it was, indeed bans, then they should have released a banned list correct? The end of the month is nearly here, so hopefully we'll either get, A. An apology for an error. B. A list of who was banned and what for. I could think of a few things that happened that no one covered...
They only give ban lists for permabans.
The number of people who get temp bans daily is astronomical on a cumulative level over a month.
It would be an administrative nightmare to track, and with their limited, and I mean limited in every sense of the word, resources and capabilities it just doesn't seem like a worthwhile usage of their time.
Granted I suspect 80% of the things they do use their time on would fall into my less than wortwhile list.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.