Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How practical is ACB for money saving purpose?
#3
Stereo Wrote:Stun will always be worse than ice for saving money, simply because of 90% vs. 100% success rate.

It does get better with ACB because you don't have a near 1.5 second cast time. Stun only lasts about 2-3 seconds so there's not as much room for failure.

I usually used CB to stun and then only attacked with Powerstrike. If you leave monsters alone, stun lasts anywhere from 4 seconds to when you leave the map (I've seen both Elder Wraiths and Skelegons stunned permanently)

I don't remember perma-immobilized mobs. I actually timed a "perma stunned" Dual Ghost Pirate, and it turned out to be roughly 2.4 minutes.

If you employ ACB correctly, it will save you a lot of money. But it can't quite beat Ice Charge in terms of getting the monsters to STFU and not attack you.

So yeah, what Stereo said xD
Reply


Messages In This Thread
How practical is ACB for money saving purpose? - by KajitiSouls - 2009-07-12, 02:35 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)