Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again
#22
Stereo Wrote:It's not useful because of the damage, it's useful because it hits faster than Crusher. It does roughly the same amount as 1 single hit out of Spear Crusher, so if you are taking down 75%+ of a monster's HP on the first hit then it's useful to finish off, cause it's faster than a second Crusher.

I'd kinda agree with your build but I don't know what you do with Sacrifice, it takes off pretty big amounts of HP (I've heard upward of 4k on a powerful DK).


Fury is better when it's hitting more targets than Crusher, which due to range differences can happen on 1-2 monsters. Of course, it's also better on mobs of 5-6.

It's usefull for its range and attack speed but in order to be usefull it does have to do good damage. And for sacrifice I agree it's not the best skill the only purpose i use it for is trying to get the highest single target damage for fun and to get into my serk HP on HT. But since I remade a 2nd DK (my first DK had max ER) I consider ER useless at the end It has been overcredited due the fact that you were supposed to get it for training at grims but it doesnt have any use nowadays I believe since it only reduces damage on a limited amount of magic types
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by 'Lexy - 2008-07-22, 06:12 AM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by Fat - 2008-07-22, 06:27 AM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by Dusk - 2008-07-22, 08:35 AM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by HiiEN - 2008-07-22, 09:36 AM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by Fat - 2008-07-22, 07:07 PM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by Renascentia - 2008-07-22, 07:29 PM
Yes, the good ol' Dk controversy again - by Ray - 2008-07-24, 04:07 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)