the msn thread

Why should I trust you guys with my msn? I want 5 paragraph essays here, people.

5 paragraph essay coming right up.

It will undoubtedly surprise some people to hear me say this, but when I first realized that I am horrified by xBTAx's devotion to the idea of a benevolent dictatorship of a self-appointed elite, a cold shudder ran down my back. Let me cut to the chase: XBTAx might have been in a lethargic state of autointoxication when he said that his faith in autism gives him an uncanny ability to detect astral energy and cosmic vibrations. More likely, perhaps, is that xBTAx has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then spiteful, disingenuous flimflammers will be free to muzzle xBTAx's critics. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how I once overheard xBTAx say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? XBTAx said that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that if he were paying attention—which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this—he'd see that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would undeniably say that if we don't embark on a new path towards change right now, then xBTAx's effusions will soon start to metastasize until they take the focus off the real issues.

In xBTAx's cringers' rush to join the crowd, they failed to observe that if we let xBTAx control what we do and how we do it, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization. How I pity him if I were to be his judge. I would start by notifying the jury that one of xBTAx's lickspittles once said, "I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that xBTAx's blanket statements are Holy Writ." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that xBTAx wants you to believe that simple-minded troglodytes aren't ever dotty. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by xBTAx's socially inept tricks.

XBTAx's cat's-paws resist seeing that the xBTAx-induced era of sham and deceit and pretense will draw to a close eventually. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to make plans and carry them out. XBTAx, please spare us the angst of living in a fallen world. If he opened his eyes, he'd realize that he is basically a bad person. He constantly insists that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. But he contradicts himself when he says that his decisions are based on reason. I am sorry to have to put this so bluntly, but I intend to look closely at xBTAx's equivocations to see what makes them so effectual at challenging all I stand for. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that xBTAx contends that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. What planet is he from? The planet Abysmal? If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that as long as I live and breathe, I will strive to shield people from xBTAx's corrupt and chthonic deceptions, so to speak.

At the very least, xBTAx's vituperations may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into boisterous, mad statism. The most sobering aspect of xBTAx's philippics is that xBTAx does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

The facts are, succinctly, these: First, xBTAx has nephelococcygic delusions about being able to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. Second, xBTAx has been known to "prove" statistically that exclusivism and neocolonialism are identical concepts. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, xBTAx's "proof" demonstrates only that he believes that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by xBTAx and his dim-witted adherents. And that, in my view, is our real problem.