Could neglect lead to destruction?

It's not religion itself, more like the variance. Noone would have any issues with Muslims if everyone were one.

That's not true at all. The chief reason Middle Eastern Muslims haven't done a lot more damage to the civilized world is because they're too busy killing each other to properly turn on their "real enemies." Think about it, the Iraq war is only on the surface between "America and the terrorists." The real issue is Iran funding terrorists to murder Iraqi civilians to cause a civil war and create a pro-Iran regime. It's a Shiite/Sunni thing more than an Arab-America thing. Many more Iraqis -- Muslims -- have been killed than American soldiers, and that is precisely what Iran intended. And look at the Palestinians. Fatah and Hamas have turned on each other, and they're too busy plotting against each other to kill Israel. The whole Middle East is like this; they go to summits and shake each other's hands knowing they have tried to assassinate each other in the past. In the end, democracy will survive because the Arab terrorists are like rabid dogs, so bent on slaughter that they don't give a pomegranate who they kill.

A Muslim person is not inherently worse than any other person, but the CULTURE they have is medieval -- backward, violent, narrow-minded. It's survived this long becuase the oil money props it up. Think of Christianity in the Middle Ages, of the Inquisitions and Crusades and pogroms. Same as that, the "Religion of Peace and Tolerance" causes massive riots or death threats if any public criticism of their prophet is made, and they produce a lot more terrorists than any other group of people. Nobody whitewashes the crimes of medieval Christianity, the only reason people whitewash the crimes of modern-medieval Arabs is because the Arabs have billions in filthy oil blood money, so they use liberal-sounding propaganda to make themselves sound nice and peachy while they plot murder.