Monster Bookworms

I like how it is sorted by the number of total cards, one should be seen as having each individual card hunted, instead of just having someone hunt one of each unique card. Just multiply your number of medals times five, not that hard.

---
As for the collaboration, it seems that most are against it.

The biggest problem with ranking by uniques is that once someone has them all... then what? We just wait for the next patch, have a race to see who gets all of the new cards and that's it? There's 297 cards in GMS currently, which is eventually going to be met. We can can count out Pink Bean even when Time Temple comes out. Eventually you know someone is going to get one of every card, however, in counting them separately, it keeps a huge open competition that can go on for a VERY long time. And even when new patches come out, it could take months to get entire sets of new cards.

Think of it this way, I've got 550ish cards now (I haven't updated in a couple of days) and I've still got TONS of cards to get. I just did the math and there's 1485 cards to be gotten if you go with sets rather than singles. I've barely covered a third of it.

So yeah, keeping it ranked by totals is the fairest way to do it, even if counting them up is a pain.

(A little tip for counting; screenshot each page and then write tallies beside each row in paint and then add them up and write them down on notepad beside a page/tab number. It makes it all a lot simpler.)