Poll: Which method would you prefer nexon use with Server Checks?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
"The server check has been extended till..."
48.65%
36 48.65%
"We finished on time! But we'll have another one next hour to finish our work on it"
6.76%
5 6.76%
I dont care. I hate both.
16.22%
12 16.22%
I dont care, I just want them to get things fixed right/I dont ms enough for it to affect me
28.38%
21 28.38%
Total 74 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The "lesser of two evils" (MS Server Checks xD)
#20
[COLOR="Magenta"][SIZE="2"]My personal opinion - If you're going to close the game and fix the bugs then, fix it all in one go. Giving server checks after server checks can be seriously annoying, especially for those who are actually camping for a FM1 spot.

I mean sure, fixing 69 different kinds of bugs within 3 hours would be ambitious but to make things much easier to everyone, they should announce the the maximum amount of time they need to fix the bugs, and keep the game closed until the desired time has is reached (And I don't think Nexon will pull this - they would always put the game up early if it's fixed early but I mean that's understandable though.) You wouldn't want to get back home at 5PM in the afternoon and see that the patch/server check had been extended for another three hours - rather have the game to be up by then after a long day!

I seriously do not mind having long periods of server checks as long as all the bugs are fixed (or majority) but this is unfortunately is an ideal world.

[/SIZE][/COLOR]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The "lesser of two evils" (MS Server Checks xD) - by Zim - 2008-07-19, 06:23 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)