Poll: Which method would you prefer nexon use with Server Checks?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
"The server check has been extended till..."
48.65%
36 48.65%
"We finished on time! But we'll have another one next hour to finish our work on it"
6.76%
5 6.76%
I dont care. I hate both.
16.22%
12 16.22%
I dont care, I just want them to get things fixed right/I dont ms enough for it to affect me
28.38%
21 28.38%
Total 74 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The "lesser of two evils" (MS Server Checks xD)
#6
I voted for the first.

Umm, if they were to say a time longer than they expect, and they'd always end early... Don't you think people will start getting mad? o.O They'll be like:

"Well, I wanted to get a FM spot, but you opened 2 hours early!! omg!!". Lol.

I'd rather they write a reasonable time, including a backup in case it runs longer... which is what they're already doing.

Ultimatley, if they didn't extended SC/Patch, you'd just be getting EVEN buggier versions. Trust me, they'd rather not extened - every minute is a loss of their money... but they also don't want to release an unstable client.

Overall, Nexon won't be getting better with deadlines as time goes on.. live with it. It's nearly impossible to assume all the technical difficulties that can occur. The only server checks that you should *expect* to finish *relativley* on time are the ones that are scheduled, for CS items + world/ign changes.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The "lesser of two evils" (MS Server Checks xD) - by Leaves - 2008-07-18, 05:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)