2009-05-21, 03:49 PM
MysticHLE Wrote:No impact? Are you really one to say that current Lukless Bishops will stand losing 600 mil mesos and have to level 10 times more regardless of what happens, Ms. Level 200 who doesn't care? You believe there is no impact and you're choosing to ignore it instead of inspecting the possibilities objectively.Bishops have posted their indifference in the former thread. I don't think you can speak for all or even most Bishops as they're a subcommunity with differing opinions. You'd be right to say you're attempting to represent the small fraction of Bishops who do own elemental wands/staves, though.
Think back to how rare it was to find a Priest to train with before 4th job came out - if you were around back then. Then think back to the increased number of Bishops after 4th job came out - if you were around back then. Then think back to the FURTHERED increase in number of Bishops after Elemental Wands came out.
Take away that factor that caused the last increase. No impact? A cause and effect sequence will be logically followed by the reverse effect if that cause were removed.
You obviously want more people to sympathize with AMs more and promote this fixing of this "glitch." I'm not arguing for Bishops for sake of fairness or balance compared to AMs, I'm arguing against you for sake of everyone else who trains with a Bishop or owns a Bishop, someone NOT like you.
Quote:Eos, you are smart, and I can easily see how you may abuse this intelligence of yours on an issue that would personally benefit you by directing only part of the argument at the ignorant majority. However, you're a bit too conniving to publicly ignore the impact this would have on Bishops and the rest of the training community, or perhaps not ignore, but to push this in a direction to benefit AMs that you want it to at the cost of others.Implying that the other side is "conniving" and/or bloating their argument has never helped a discussion, for the record.
I also believe we'd all be better of realizing we're not infallible.

