2009-05-21, 11:29 AM
First of all, demand is an issue that exists alongside price, and even though our prices are similar to msea prices, who's to say that they wouldn't be different if bishops had the -75%? I know I'm getting into "what if's" here, but I think things would be different.
And secondly, I made my statement in the last post with the assumption that it isn't wrong for arch mages to outdamage bishops at skeles even though skeles are holy weak. Bishops use half the cost of our ultimate alongside holy symbol to compensate for this, it's an issue of balance and not who is stronger. Why don't people realize that a bishop and arch mage who both hit 99ks are not equal by any means? Its numerically impossible which is why giving arch mages these weapons is a step in the right direction and denying bishops an endgame weapon meant for another class is what was intended.
And secondly, I made my statement in the last post with the assumption that it isn't wrong for arch mages to outdamage bishops at skeles even though skeles are holy weak. Bishops use half the cost of our ultimate alongside holy symbol to compensate for this, it's an issue of balance and not who is stronger. Why don't people realize that a bishop and arch mage who both hit 99ks are not equal by any means? Its numerically impossible which is why giving arch mages these weapons is a step in the right direction and denying bishops an endgame weapon meant for another class is what was intended.