Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Discovery channel
#11
xCenario Wrote:Look, im no expert in astronomy, I don't study the cosmos and from what I just saw neither do you. And that wouldn't be close-minded and egocentric because as you may know, life in another planet is just a theory for now. Such as warm-holes and having another parallel dimension simultaneously to us, is a theory, unproven theories until today. So if everyone still have believes that theories are proven wrong like it has been for the entire existence of Science, I have the right to anticipate that this one will be wrong too.

Now if you felt a little bit offended by my post, or if you felt like im an idiot for saying such. Then go ahead and continue to follow the same bit of info they give you in the internet of little robots landing in Mars and finding bits of particles that may bring the possibility of there being life in the planet. Go study the cosmos and complex world of the universe, I will be waiting for said proof to arrive. But in the meantime, I mantain my opinion of there not being any other life in the universe. Biggrin

I am not offended, nor am I calling you an idiot. I'm also not clueless when it comes to space science because I've taken astronomy and physics classes in university. There is no need to get all defensive because this is, after all, a discussion and a debate.

Technically, all theories are unproven and that's why they remain theories and not become laws. However, theories are based on evidence. Worm holes are theoretical, but they're sometimes solutions to general relativity problems. Life on other planets is also theoretical, but there is evidence to support it, and there is nothing truly special about life. Miller and Urey created essential organic molecules such as amino acids just by using a spark of electricity and chemicals you can find in toilet cleaners. You've also got bacteria living in extreme environments that would easily freeze or boil a human alive. You've got 100 billion galaxies in the universe, each with an average of 100 billion stars. If none of those 10,000 billion billion stars contain any planets without any form of life, well then the universe is a pretty big waste of space to say the least.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Discovery channel - by Trinity - 2008-07-17, 12:26 AM
Discovery channel - by Soapy - 2008-07-17, 12:34 AM
Discovery channel - by xCenario - 2008-07-17, 01:48 AM
Discovery channel - by Lylac - 2008-07-17, 06:09 AM
Discovery channel - by Brandini - 2008-07-17, 07:02 AM
Discovery channel - by Trinity - 2008-07-17, 09:41 AM
Discovery channel - by Soapy - 2008-07-17, 12:16 PM
Discovery channel - by xCenario - 2008-07-17, 03:11 PM
Discovery channel - by Lylac - 2008-07-18, 01:24 AM
Discovery channel - by xCenario - 2008-07-18, 06:11 AM
Discovery channel - by Lylac - 2008-07-18, 06:30 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: