2009-04-25, 11:56 PM
In this letter, I'm not going to argue that denominationalism is arguably the most frightening and devastating problem facing us all. Nor am I going to argue that Lerk's notions are as troubling as his insistence that children should belong to the state. I'm not going to argue those factors because they're irrelevant. Instead, I will say only that he is incapable of rational thought about the real world. But first, let me pose you a question: Is he actually concerned about any of us or does he just want to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers? After reading this letter, you'll indubitably find it's the latter. I intend to look closely at Lerk's agendas to see what makes them so effectual at turning wimps loose against us good citizens. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that we must solve the problems that are important to most people. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that Lerk doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
It's somewhat tricky to defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that Lerk so desperately wants to abolish, especially since the media in this country tend to ignore historical connections and are reluctant to analyze ideological positions or treat a fringe political group seriously. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that his propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Lerk values our perspectives" and, "Lerk has achieved sainthood". What they don't tell you, though, is that Lerk's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. When I first heard about his expositions, I didn't know whether to laugh, because his catch-phrases are so contemptible, or cry, because he has so frequently lied about how his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality—that some weaker-minded people are starting to believe it. We need to explain to such people that if Lerk truly believes that he is a model citizen, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
Note that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of all people who might be considered tyrannical firebrands of one sort or another. It is only a rough indication of some of Lerk's general tendencies. Lerk has an ego of galactic proportions. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why for those of us who make our living trying to criticize Lerk's complicity in the widespread establishment of imperialism, it is important to consider that he insists that his reports are our final line of defense against tyrrany. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
Lerk says he's not testy but he's sincerely spleeny and that's essentially the same thing. If I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Lerk-induced disaster. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that Lerk's favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". He likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to allow federally funded research to mushroom into an obnoxious, grossly inefficient system, hampered by predatory backstabbers and bad-tempered masters of deceit. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that after hearing about Lerk's counter-productive attempts to provide selfish pipsqueaks with an irresistible temptation to descend to character assassination and name calling, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Lerk obviously yearns for the Oriental despotisms of pre-Hellenic times, the neolithic culture that preceded the rise of self-consciousness and egoism. By the same token, he abhors the current era, in which people are free to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most anal-retentive manifestations.
My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Lerk that his anecdotes are devoid of any intellectual substance. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that we must lead us all toward a better, brighter future. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that if Lerk were paying attention—which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this—he'd see that he is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's impertinent to shield people from his lubricious and bookish deceptions; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that if Lerk believes that two wrongs make a right, then it's obvious why he thinks that the sky is falling. I would like to close by saying that I don't see how Lerk can be so hotheaded.
It's somewhat tricky to defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that Lerk so desperately wants to abolish, especially since the media in this country tend to ignore historical connections and are reluctant to analyze ideological positions or treat a fringe political group seriously. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that his propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Lerk values our perspectives" and, "Lerk has achieved sainthood". What they don't tell you, though, is that Lerk's faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. When I first heard about his expositions, I didn't know whether to laugh, because his catch-phrases are so contemptible, or cry, because he has so frequently lied about how his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality—that some weaker-minded people are starting to believe it. We need to explain to such people that if Lerk truly believes that he is a model citizen, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
Note that the foregoing does not pretend to be an accurate description of all people who might be considered tyrannical firebrands of one sort or another. It is only a rough indication of some of Lerk's general tendencies. Lerk has an ego of galactic proportions. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, you'll understand why for those of us who make our living trying to criticize Lerk's complicity in the widespread establishment of imperialism, it is important to consider that he insists that his reports are our final line of defense against tyrrany. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
Lerk says he's not testy but he's sincerely spleeny and that's essentially the same thing. If I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Lerk-induced disaster. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that Lerk's favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". He likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to allow federally funded research to mushroom into an obnoxious, grossly inefficient system, hampered by predatory backstabbers and bad-tempered masters of deceit. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that after hearing about Lerk's counter-productive attempts to provide selfish pipsqueaks with an irresistible temptation to descend to character assassination and name calling, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Lerk obviously yearns for the Oriental despotisms of pre-Hellenic times, the neolithic culture that preceded the rise of self-consciousness and egoism. By the same token, he abhors the current era, in which people are free to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most anal-retentive manifestations.
My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Lerk that his anecdotes are devoid of any intellectual substance. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that we must lead us all toward a better, brighter future. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that if Lerk were paying attention—which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this—he'd see that he is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's impertinent to shield people from his lubricious and bookish deceptions; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that if Lerk believes that two wrongs make a right, then it's obvious why he thinks that the sky is falling. I would like to close by saying that I don't see how Lerk can be so hotheaded.