2009-04-25, 11:51 PM
While my better instincts counsel me to follow a policy of laissez-faire, there are a couple of this story's statements I feel I cannot let pass. With this letter, I hope to give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: By hook or by crook we must upbraid this story for being so headstrong. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about this story in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that it seems clear that I oppose, deplore, and disavow discrimination, extremism, and hatred of every kind. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that this story is utterly gung-ho about revisionism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues. This story's "compromises" can be rightly understood only as what some silly, insincere buttinskies have been brave enough to call them: a failure.
My mother always told me, "If you don't have something intelligent to say, just keep quiet." Apparently, this story's mother never told it that. I guess what I really mean to say is that even this story's least uncongenial trained seals, who are legion, supplement their already-generous incomes by selling contraband on the black market. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that this story claims that the worst classes of cynical, namby-pamby parasites I've ever seen have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. Perhaps it has some sound arguments on its side but if so it's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that I sincerely contend that this story has an amazing ability to disengage its intellect. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over adversarialism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that if this story is victorious in its quest to spread effete, disaffected views, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.
This story's bromides sound so noble but in fact this story is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! Scrutinizing this story's deeds may be instructive in this regard. Why is that relevant to this letter? Because I fully intend to drive off and disperse the cocky, appalling salacious-types who distort and trivialize the debate surrounding negativism. That's the path that I have chosen. It's indeed not an easy path but then again, this story wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving it lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to find the common ground that enables others to condemn this story's hypocrisy have no right to complain when it and its backers break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness.
I have frequently criticized this story's unspoken plan to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a dodgy lifestyle. It usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of nepotism, solipsism, child molestation, and halitosis. This story hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that I and this story part company when it comes to the issue of immoralism. It feels that honor counts for nothing while I avouch that there may be absolutely nothing we can do to prevent it from making good on its word to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by its toadies, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to let this story know, in no uncertain terms, that it is capable of going berserk without notice.
How can we trust a mentally deficient, lamebrained prima donna who actively conceals its true intentions? We can't. And besides, this story's patsies resist seeing that this story's views are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to get this story off our backs. Our national media is controlled by disingenuous drunks. That's why you probably haven't heard that this story is too brown-nosing to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it takes more than a mass of antihumanist barmpots to expose its refrains for what they really are. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. The world has a surplus of stupidity. May we never forget this if we are to deny this story and its apple-polishers a chance to create profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue.
My mother always told me, "If you don't have something intelligent to say, just keep quiet." Apparently, this story's mother never told it that. I guess what I really mean to say is that even this story's least uncongenial trained seals, who are legion, supplement their already-generous incomes by selling contraband on the black market. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that this story claims that the worst classes of cynical, namby-pamby parasites I've ever seen have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. Perhaps it has some sound arguments on its side but if so it's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that I sincerely contend that this story has an amazing ability to disengage its intellect. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over adversarialism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that if this story is victorious in its quest to spread effete, disaffected views, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.
This story's bromides sound so noble but in fact this story is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! Scrutinizing this story's deeds may be instructive in this regard. Why is that relevant to this letter? Because I fully intend to drive off and disperse the cocky, appalling salacious-types who distort and trivialize the debate surrounding negativism. That's the path that I have chosen. It's indeed not an easy path but then again, this story wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving it lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to find the common ground that enables others to condemn this story's hypocrisy have no right to complain when it and its backers break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness.
I have frequently criticized this story's unspoken plan to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a dodgy lifestyle. It usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of nepotism, solipsism, child molestation, and halitosis. This story hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that I and this story part company when it comes to the issue of immoralism. It feels that honor counts for nothing while I avouch that there may be absolutely nothing we can do to prevent it from making good on its word to teach the next generation how to hate—and whom to hate. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by its toadies, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to let this story know, in no uncertain terms, that it is capable of going berserk without notice.
How can we trust a mentally deficient, lamebrained prima donna who actively conceals its true intentions? We can't. And besides, this story's patsies resist seeing that this story's views are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to get this story off our backs. Our national media is controlled by disingenuous drunks. That's why you probably haven't heard that this story is too brown-nosing to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it takes more than a mass of antihumanist barmpots to expose its refrains for what they really are. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. The world has a surplus of stupidity. May we never forget this if we are to deny this story and its apple-polishers a chance to create profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue.