2009-04-11, 10:23 PM
All below calculations assume the following:
- Base level of 150 (unless stated otherwise)
- Basic attack of 400
- Mastery of 60%
- Include elemental staves (if the player has them) and Elemental Amplification (KMS values)
Introduction:
Welcome to the ultimate magician damage scaling thread! This thread is largely different from all other threads because it calculates your REAL magician’s damage. This is because the magic damage formula is known and extremely accurate.
It can often be difficult to tell, “Whose mage is better?” Every mage has different elemental weapons, skills, and base attacks available, and thus there is no clear cut way to say “My mage is strong.” This topic will remedy this problem.
How the calculation is performed:
By receiving statistics from you about your level, INT, and MATK, I can calculate your damage. To calculate the damage, I assume a basic attack of 400 and 60% mastery. At no point during the calculations do I check for the damage cap, so this is not an issue. Also, I assume that the person is at level 150 who allocates all points to INT (also accounting for job advancements), as is common among most “best damage” threads. Lastly, the Damage Amplification used for this topic assumes the new Amplification multipliers from KMS in which, at level 30, is a 40% boost instead of 35%.
Credit to everyone in Russt’s thread for figuring out the damage formula.
MAX MAGIC DAMAGE = ((Magic²/1000 + Magic)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Amp * Elemental Staff
MIN MAGIC DAMAGE = ((Magic²/1000 + Magic * Mastery * 0.9)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Amp * Elemental Staff
My theory on what bonuses should count is very simple – if the bonus shows in the upper right corner of your screen while used, the bonus will not be counted for this calculation. This rules out Meditation, pots, Maple Hero, etc. while also allowing elemental staves and amplification. If you happen to use Maple Warrior to equip your wand/staff, include the LUK from MW to equip the wand/staf but not the INT as to not affect the damage calculation.
The source that I use is open and freely usable by anyone in the public. If you see any corrections that need to be made in the source, please let me know.
Requirements:
1. You must be at least second job or higher to apply
2. You must post a screenshot of your entire stat window.
3. If you will be claiming that you have an elemental staff, you must be an f/p or i/l mage and post your inventory showing that you have it equipped.
If you are a cleric/priest/bishop, please fill out the following form:
[noparse]IGN:
Class:
Level:
INT:
MATK: [/noparse]
Otherwise, please fill out the following form:
[noparse]IGN:
Class:
Level:
INT:
MATK:
Amp Level:
Elemental Staff?: [/noparse]
For “Elemental Staff?”, please put a “1” if you have one and “0” if you do not.
Here's a hypothetical example of what I'm looking for:
IGN: MyMage
Class: I/L Archmage
Level: 123
INT: 999
MATK: 1999
Amp Level: 30
Elemental Staff?: 1
Layout:
There will be three spoilers, one for each branch of mages. In each spoiler, I will calculate the minimum and maximum damage of each mage and rank them from highest to lowest according to minimum damage.
In the final spoiler, “Levels”, all bonuses given to archmages are removed. This puts all three branches of the mage class on a very even playing field. Then the table is sorted according to descending level. This way you can compare how your damage ranks with your peers.
- Base level of 150 (unless stated otherwise)
- Basic attack of 400
- Mastery of 60%
- Include elemental staves (if the player has them) and Elemental Amplification (KMS values)
Cleric/Priest/Bishop
I/L Mages
F/P Mages
Without level adjustments, elemental staves, and Amp...
Introduction:
Welcome to the ultimate magician damage scaling thread! This thread is largely different from all other threads because it calculates your REAL magician’s damage. This is because the magic damage formula is known and extremely accurate.
It can often be difficult to tell, “Whose mage is better?” Every mage has different elemental weapons, skills, and base attacks available, and thus there is no clear cut way to say “My mage is strong.” This topic will remedy this problem.
How the calculation is performed:
By receiving statistics from you about your level, INT, and MATK, I can calculate your damage. To calculate the damage, I assume a basic attack of 400 and 60% mastery. At no point during the calculations do I check for the damage cap, so this is not an issue. Also, I assume that the person is at level 150 who allocates all points to INT (also accounting for job advancements), as is common among most “best damage” threads. Lastly, the Damage Amplification used for this topic assumes the new Amplification multipliers from KMS in which, at level 30, is a 40% boost instead of 35%.
Credit to everyone in Russt’s thread for figuring out the damage formula.
MAX MAGIC DAMAGE = ((Magic²/1000 + Magic)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Amp * Elemental Staff
MIN MAGIC DAMAGE = ((Magic²/1000 + Magic * Mastery * 0.9)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Amp * Elemental Staff
My theory on what bonuses should count is very simple – if the bonus shows in the upper right corner of your screen while used, the bonus will not be counted for this calculation. This rules out Meditation, pots, Maple Hero, etc. while also allowing elemental staves and amplification. If you happen to use Maple Warrior to equip your wand/staff, include the LUK from MW to equip the wand/staf but not the INT as to not affect the damage calculation.
The source that I use is open and freely usable by anyone in the public. If you see any corrections that need to be made in the source, please let me know.
Source Code
So what you need to do:Requirements:
1. You must be at least second job or higher to apply
2. You must post a screenshot of your entire stat window.
3. If you will be claiming that you have an elemental staff, you must be an f/p or i/l mage and post your inventory showing that you have it equipped.
If you are a cleric/priest/bishop, please fill out the following form:
[noparse]IGN:
Class:
Level:
INT:
MATK: [/noparse]
Otherwise, please fill out the following form:
[noparse]IGN:
Class:
Level:
INT:
MATK:
Amp Level:
Elemental Staff?: [/noparse]
For “Elemental Staff?”, please put a “1” if you have one and “0” if you do not.
Here's a hypothetical example of what I'm looking for:
IGN: MyMage
Class: I/L Archmage
Level: 123
INT: 999
MATK: 1999
Amp Level: 30
Elemental Staff?: 1
Layout:
There will be three spoilers, one for each branch of mages. In each spoiler, I will calculate the minimum and maximum damage of each mage and rank them from highest to lowest according to minimum damage.
In the final spoiler, “Levels”, all bonuses given to archmages are removed. This puts all three branches of the mage class on a very even playing field. Then the table is sorted according to descending level. This way you can compare how your damage ranks with your peers.
