my first pit of hell rant...

In case you hadn't noticed, Harrison and anyone else whose name came up here, these are not handwritten rants. They're computer generated. Hence the fact that none of the arguments in them make sense (though this fact seems irrelevant to some people) and the points they make seem completely offtopic. Those of us who realized the OP's post was a generated rant joined in with other generated rants, and people who didn't suddenly began wondering why we all became so verbose in our arguments. XD

so yeah.
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
have fun.

The following are simply some random thoughts that have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd like to let out—a little house cleaning, if you will. Let's get down to brass tacks: RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. What do you think the chances are that RUBBER DUCKIES INC. will eventually stop destroying our moral fiber? I assure you, the likelihood of that is slim to none. The reason is that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to give peace a chance and those who wish to suck up to intransigent cadgers. Naturally, RUBBER DUCKIES INC. belongs to the latter category.

We ought to provide some balance to RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s one-sided epigrams. That'll make RUBBER DUCKIES INC. think once—I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that it has previously given any thought to the matter—before trying to suppress people's instinct and intellect. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that it accepts superstition for science, hokum and magic for medicine, monotone chanting for music, and lethargic passivity in lieu of discovery and inquiry. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying its repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why RUBBER DUCKIES INC. is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, its willingness to force us to do things or take stands against our will sets a new record for brazenness.

It's possible that anger is contagious. However, I cannot speculate about that possibility here because I need to devote more space to a description of how finding the best way to catalogue RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s swindles and perversions while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear is a challenging problem indeed. We must therefore tackle this problem with more determination, more tenacity, and more fanaticism than it has ever been tackled before. Only then will people realize that RUBBER DUCKIES INC. thinks we want it to waste hours and hours of our time in fruitless conferences and meetings. Excuse me, but maybe I can honestly suggest how it ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with RUBBER DUCKIES INC. itself. My intention here is not just to say "no" to RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s possession-obsessed modes of thought but also to call a spade a spade.

RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s protests manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: force us to bow down low before haughty vandals. Phase two: redefine success and obscure failure. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of egotism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, it invariably instructs its lapdogs to weaken our mental and moral fiber. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s illogical stratagems.

RUBBER DUCKIES INC. used to be a major proponent of Pyrrhonism. Nowadays, it's putting all of its support behind adversarialism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. The long and short of it is that there's an important difference between me and RUBBER DUCKIES INC.. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. RUBBER DUCKIES INC., in contrast, is willing to kill for its—or, if not to kill, at least to jawbone aimlessly.

If RUBBER DUCKIES INC. could have one wish, it'd wish for the ability to desecrate religious objects. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that RUBBER DUCKIES INC. may spit in the face of propriety right after it reads this letter. Let it. In the blink of an eye, I will show RUBBER DUCKIES INC. how it is as wrong as wrong can be. The problem with RUBBER DUCKIES INC. is not that it's petty. It's that it wants to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. refuses to come to terms with reality. It prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.

Since most people oppose RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s ethically bankrupt musings, it has had to focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things using every indecent means imaginable. If we are to encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the wretched and dotty ideologies that RUBBER DUCKIES INC. promotes. Let me mention again that I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s subterfuge. I'm completely stunned. Did it ever occur to RUBBER DUCKIES INC. that it can't see the forest for the trees? The answer is rather depressing but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must shed the light of truth on the evil that is RUBBER DUCKIES INC.. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s ideologies were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s maudlin preoccupation with cameralism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "internationalization", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that when RUBBER DUCKIES INC. says that anyone who disagrees with it is ultimately unimaginative, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound.

If you were to tell RUBBER DUCKIES INC. that it has an implacable determination to satisfy its own ambitions and lusts at whatever cost to its cringers, its nation, and even to its own progeny, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. If RUBBER DUCKIES INC. sincerely believes that it is entitled to cashier anyone who tries to reinforce what is best in people then it must be smoking something illegal. For the most part, RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s apologists will have to stop shouting "Me, me!" and learn to harmonize on "Us, us!". Still, we must put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own gormless, apolaustic expedients. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. motivates people to join its den of thieves by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What RUBBER DUCKIES INC. really wants to do is supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. That's why I, for one, want to open students' eyes, minds, hearts, and souls to the world around them. That may seem simple enough, but I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that make RUBBER DUCKIES INC. pay for its crimes against humanity. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why I wonder if RUBBER DUCKIES INC. really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check.

What really irks me is that RUBBER DUCKIES INC. has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let it make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its tactics or it'll dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. does not want to declare that it has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of misoneism because it is brassbound, libidinous, callous, and ill-bred (though, granted, RUBBER DUCKIES INC. is all of the aforementioned) but rather because we must act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even Fabianism. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that I must ask that RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s buddies throw down the gauntlet and challenge RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s dupes to act honorably. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to fleece us. RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way.

When I first became aware of RUBBER DUCKIES INC.'s covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that we could opt to sit back and let RUBBER DUCKIES INC. put the prisoners in charge of running the prison. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. RUBBER DUCKIES INC. has recently been going around claiming that it is an organization of peace. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. Sorry for babbling so much, but people are looking for answers, not ideology.




[SIZE="4"]This is DELICIOUS[/SIZE]

Fully quoted Wikipedia is your friend.

Indeed it is! I did it first, though




Also, ROFL at Harrisonized.