Liar Tree Sap 100%

Seriously, stop saying I favor one view. That's like saying Atheism is a religion when it's the lack of religion.

I'm presenting more than one ways to view this situations to tell people to stop assuming.

Assuming it is a nonglitch (and therefore safe to use) is as much of an assumption as assuming it is not.

The way I view this is that sapping your branch nose is a function of the game. It does that regardless of intention. Nonglitch is merely a label because we cannot assume it's a glitch.

It is not merely a label if you use it to justify an action.

The problem with this it that you KNOW that two of them are poisoned. You don't know for this case. You can speculate but you cannot know for certain.

But what matters is the one you (or Nexon) selected, not the other two. You don't know that that is poisoned. You can speculate but you cannot know for certain (yet).

Again, I already agreed to this, so why bring it up again.

Because 'bannable' is the poisoned bottle and 'assimilated feature' is the safe one. If you weren't so intent on breaking posts into little chunks, this would be fairly obvious.

No. At the time, Jackk and I didn't know whether or not it worked. However, we did have opposing views on the situation. While I was calling it a feature, Jackk was calling it a glitch. However, there was no evidence at the time of it working or not, and since this was all speculation, we could rationalize that we're doing it for "good intent" and to "satisfy curiosity" and thus I talked Jackk into trying it.

I don't see how the keyword is "wasn't" because it was later clearly a glitch when Nexon decided to change the way the white scrolls worked.

You clearly missed the point I was trying to make, so I won't bother replying to this.

And, though this wasn't directed at me..

Eh? It's more like logic. Math proofs have nothing to do with this.

Math and logic have everything to do with each other.