Harrisonized Wrote:I'm not proposing that. I'm saying that it is possible. With such doubt in mind, one cannot call either a glitch.But in both situations, there is still no 'innocent'. Clearly there is no way that everything is working as intended, so why favor one possible situation over another?
And yes, you ARE favoring your explanation. Your position of "cannot be determined, therefore we can't say it's a glitch" isn't really valid. Let me explain:
Say there are three bottles of water in front of you (lol @ all the water bottles in this thread), and you know that two of them are poisoned, but not which ones. Are you going to pick up one and try to drink it ("we aren't sure that this one's poisoned, so we can't say it is"...), or are you going to play it safe and find water elsewhere?
Even if it can become a feature like HP washing has (and I honestly do not see any reason why it should), it can also become bannable.
Harrisonized Wrote:So this is a "known" glitch, and the clean slate glitch wasn't? We both knew the clean slate glitch was a glitch. In fact, you even described it to me as a glitch when I was still calling it a feature.Key word: wasn't. If you notice what part he was replying to, Retalion is referring to back when he tested the glitch (even before we knew it worked and you were asserting that it was a feature).