2009-03-25, 11:46 PM
Harrisonized Wrote:1) You have no basis for calling me a "fool".
2) You're not very well succeeding as much as the TS to inject vocab into your post since I can understand this prose perfectly.
3) How am I an amoral control freak?If I did prefer thinking such thoughts, then I wouldn't enter the many debates around here deciding what are glitches and what aren't and what are meant to be and what aren't. I wouldn't start such discussions either. Stop speaking like you know what goes inside my brain because it is apparent that you do not know me at all.Stating the obvious is useless. My point is to point out this to everyone who loves to state the obvious that they are just to waste time typing it out and that they waste others' time reading it.
So you mean to say that by posting my opinions that I'm brainwashing you. Thus, by your logic, everyone in this thread is attempting brainwash in some form. Really, only someone delusional or traumatized would write that.Your attempt at the vocabulary injeciton stopped here. That's because in "formal" writing, which by the way is a pain to read, you do NOT use the word "you".Retaliation is inevitable. I don't see why it's so dangerous as it'll lead to cognitive development.That's hilarious. I said nothing about eating. Meanwhile, I have not hired anybody to "extirpate the things you cherish". You think you're on my list of priorities? Don't try to make yourself significant when you're not. You're just an insignificant being that I haven't heard about until today. Again, don't try to make yourself sound significant to me because you're not. Why should I care about your well being?If you want freedom, just ignore what I say. It's that simple.LOL yea. Except that only SekushiKun and sicnarf managed to frustrate me cuz they're overdoing it. The other ones seem fine to read.
Because many of the things I'm about to say regarding Harrisonized have already been beaten into the ground, I will try to keep this letter short. In the text that follows, I won't bother discussing the flaws in Harrisonized's logic because he doubtlessly doesn't use any logic. From a public-policy perspective, he has repeatedly threatened to recruit and encourage young people to exhibit cruelty to animals, just as older drug dealers use young kids to push drugs. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because Harrisonized accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he think I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that ethnocentrism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be.
I have the following advice for Harrisonized: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. I believe, way deep down, that I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to embark on a new path towards change. It's also why I say that Harrisonized demands that we make a choice. Either we let him shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size or he'll palliate and excuse the atrocities of his emissaries. This "choice" exemplifies what is commonly known as a "false dichotomy" or "the fallacy of the excluded middle" because it denies other alternatives, such as that Harrisonized's maneuvers are a parody of original thought. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must inculcate in the reader an inquisitive spirit and a skepticism about beliefs that Harrisonized's forces take for granted. To cap that off, Harrisonized claims that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another dastardly attempt to sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death.
If we don't rake Harrisonized over the coals for breaking down our communities, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Harrisonized's most recent perceptions are irreverent, in bad taste, and inappropriate. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to him. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that by refusing to act, by refusing to direct our efforts toward clearly defined goals and measure progress toward those goals as frequently and as objectively as possible, we are giving Harrisonized the power to cashier anyone who tries to draw an accurate portrait of his ideological alignment. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.