Harrisonized Wrote:That's because I have a strong belief in what's known as "innocent until proven guilty".
Really, your innocent until proven guilty bs seems more an excuse than an actual reason. Seems that common sense isnt proof enough for you. As Ive said before, are you a child? Do you need EVERYTHING explained to you in pure black and white terms before you believe it? Do you REALLY have no ability to think for yourself that things are okay to do till they clearly say you cant? Does your mom really have to tell you "Do not throw my Green and white sweater into that mud puddle 3 meters in front and to the left of our front door gate" for you to know not to do it?
With that in mind, cant I throw a cliche right back at you? "Better safe than sorry" If you're not sure, then take the safe route; dont do it and have no risk of getting banned/losing your item at all. If you threw your mom's sweater into the puddle and answer her with "You never told me not to", does that mean you're off the hook? Better not mess around with your mom's sweater in case she doesnt want it dirty.
That aside, I'm pretty sure the game doesnt work as "innocent till proven guilty", as EVERY single glitch you've exploited has ended up with it indeed being a glitch.
"BIGFOOT ISNT A GLITCH TILL THEY SAY IT IS!@31!@@!@$!@#!" ...well... they announced it as so
"CLEAN SLATE IS NOT A GLITCH CAUSE NEXON MADE NO ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT [email]IT@@@@@"...they[/email] never made an announcement about it but it doesnt work anymore. If it WASNT a glitch, you'd think they wouldnt fix it, no?
I dont know, but by past experience, some of us here can say that you claiming it not to be a glitch is proof enough that it is a glitch.
Quote:Unless Nexon clearly states that this is a glitch, it is not.No of course not. I'm saying that the whole event was a glitch, and that Nexon didn't make the tree branch noses for the event any different from the ones obtainable from Gachapon. If the tree branches from the event are glitched, then the ones from the Gachapon are not. Thus, one could rationalize saying that the tree saps were indeed supposed to work on the gachapon branches.Yes. It's merely you misinterpreting what I'm saying that causes what I write to not make sense.Don't assume things unless backed up with sufficient evidence. For now, just assume what's safe to assume and that because Nexon released it in such a style, it's safe to say.
As Ive said, hasnt this event been released in KMS/other versions before us like most events of this manner? Have their saps worked on their gachapon tree branches? Im pretty sure they didnt or else this wouldnt be a discovery at all like it seems the way its mentioned here by some people. If they didnt work there and work here, is that enough "proof" to call it a glitch?
Quote:Also, whos to say that you didn't actually chaos your Branch nose as opposed to using a tree sap on it? There's no way to do an item purge on this.
Do you know anyone who's chaos'd their tree branch? The simple answer will be for nexon to just purge all these branches, then have whoever actually chaos'd their nose go complain; do you know anyone who's chaosed their nose for more strength? I certainly dont.
Quote:Another way to say this is that Nexon should've opened Tespia to test these but they didn't. Thus we can say that what they release are final, though subject to change, final.
Tespia wouldnt help; As seen in the testings last year, even when people reported the bugs, they just imported the said bugs directly to GMS (Pet looting glitch, broken quests, mispellings, etc.).
Edit:
Quote:I don't think using 150+ tickets without any luck is cheaper than buying a white scroll...
You missed the point there... How much I spent is irrelevant, as are the motives. I wasnt gaching 150 tickets to get the nose to gach. In fact, I havent touched gach tickets since this event started. I wanted the nose for the stats it added: 4 str and a potential 0-10 dex from 60/70% scrolls. People buy the white scrolls with intention to glitch them, I buy the tickets with the intention of using the item for what its actually supposed to be used for.