2009-02-26, 12:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 2009-02-26, 12:30 PM by KajitiSouls.)
Khaizuko Wrote:I didnt get this part:
Accuracy for Max Hit-Rate = 55 * [(Monster Avoid) / 15] = 3.667 * (Monster Avoid)
Accuracy for Min Hit-Rate = 55 * [(Monster Avoid) / 30] = 1.833 * (Monster Avoid)
Also..
55 * [(Monster Avoid) / 15] equals 1,833 or 3,66? Makes no sense :[
55/15 = 3.667, while 55/30 = 1.833. Simple, no? Btw, don't confuse min/max hit-rate formulas. You should concentrate on the max hit-rate.
Khaizuko Wrote:About: Sacrificing atk for acc.
My eq:
3 dex, 1 acc bamboo.
14 dex chainmail
3 dex shoe (clean lv 50 ones..)
7 atk glove as mention, i gotta buy the acc glove..i think a total of 10acc costs around 1m?
100%'d lionheart. I got a 100%'d lions fang too, but according to many lionheart is still better... :O
Also rage increases my dmg with..100 or so in atk range, and the glove about 70-80.
Dont remember exactly
But whats your thoughts about this?
Getting 100% hit-rate on the monsters you train on should be your top priority. As long as you can achieve this after you lvl up sufficiently (say, at the monster's lvl at least), you can focus on damage and have little care in the world. At least until they release higher training lvls where the monsters have higher avoid.
The reason why people say the Lionheart is better is because it's a 2h Fast(4) sword. That's a pretty godly speed compared to the Lion's Fang, which has Normal(6) speed.

