You don't really need to do a plot to see what's best in excel.
Just set it up so one direction is total points (1, 2, .. 60), and the other direction is number of points in Boost (0, 1, ... 30)
At any given point (x,y) on the grid, y = boost, (x-y) = se. Obviously there are 2 triangular areas which can't happen (#boost > #points, #points > #se+#boost).
The main thing throwing off a general solution is the fact that Boost depends on your base stats, SE does not. If you have crappy w.atk Boost is more useful (100+10 = 10%, 150+10 = 7%)
And of course since Boost goes on a 5 point improvement (level 1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 I think), you'd have to compare big jumps to decide which is a better route.
Anyway, comparing the values in each column would tell you the optimal # of points in SE/Boost if you have that number of points available.
Just set it up so one direction is total points (1, 2, .. 60), and the other direction is number of points in Boost (0, 1, ... 30)
At any given point (x,y) on the grid, y = boost, (x-y) = se. Obviously there are 2 triangular areas which can't happen (#boost > #points, #points > #se+#boost).
The main thing throwing off a general solution is the fact that Boost depends on your base stats, SE does not. If you have crappy w.atk Boost is more useful (100+10 = 10%, 150+10 = 7%)
And of course since Boost goes on a 5 point improvement (level 1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 I think), you'd have to compare big jumps to decide which is a better route.
Anyway, comparing the values in each column would tell you the optimal # of points in SE/Boost if you have that number of points available.