2009-02-18, 04:27 AM
Rusty, no need to recite Maple history to me... I've played since early open Beta, I know the top levels have (usually) been priests/bishops. And Avenge, you can try to not be rude about my personal decisions for training. As modular said, I don't like to train alone (he would know) and I prefer to play as a supporting class vs. attacker--hence why I haven't exactly levelled much in my server since it came out compared to other players. It really just doesn't matter to me, though I'd like to keep the little experience I do receive instead of losing it to a new damage formula.
I guess I should reword what I was initially saying. It would suck for priests like me, who like to train with other people and, yes, rely on other attackers for majority of the experience. Is this a wrong way to play Maple? The only reason I made a priest to begin with was because my main training partner was going to be a warrior. Training solo is boring and frankly unrewarding for me. I'd rather get on and have someone to interact with then play all by myself. If I want to do something solo I'll go work on homework.
So stop the hate, it's really pointless. Nitpicking poor logic when the argument in question never offended you personally is just stupid. I am aware of the issues with my first response to this thread, and have now clarified. =)
I guess I should reword what I was initially saying. It would suck for priests like me, who like to train with other people and, yes, rely on other attackers for majority of the experience. Is this a wrong way to play Maple? The only reason I made a priest to begin with was because my main training partner was going to be a warrior. Training solo is boring and frankly unrewarding for me. I'd rather get on and have someone to interact with then play all by myself. If I want to do something solo I'll go work on homework.
So stop the hate, it's really pointless. Nitpicking poor logic when the argument in question never offended you personally is just stupid. I am aware of the issues with my first response to this thread, and have now clarified. =)

