2017-02-01, 12:18 PM
VerrKol Wrote:Flonne; Just to clarify. You think it's more likely that the CIA or similar foreign intelligence agency SUCCESSFULLY brainwashed an innocent man into confessing to committing a domestic terror attack to cover up the actual Islamic culprit because it interfere's with Trudeau's political narrative?
No, I honestly don't think the Muslim guy was in the plan regardless of whether or not he did anything, if he committed any violence at all it would have been as a solo act.
This happened days after Trump's ban went into effect, and the guy follows Trump on facebook; whether as an actual follower or a "following the enemy" follower, it does not matter, because the media will say it was the former regardless. The timing is too perfect for the left's narrative. Him turning himself in is too perfect for the left's narrative; you really think a legitimate racist white supremacist /pol/ browser would have felt sorry for doing something like that? The sum of the parts just does not add up. Yes, a white guy killed some Muslims, and yes, it was most likely just him involved in the actual killing, but the devil is in the details. It's only been a few days since this happened and already the narrative has moved precisely to where I thought it would; Canada is calling for open borders for all refugees, which is exactly what Trudeau wanted to begin with. When things work out perfectly for a politician like that you should always be wary.