#Gamergate

The judge rejected the appeal, 140M is what they are stuck with as the charge unless there's a way to appeal a rejection of an appeal, which, given how pineappleing stupid our legal system is, it's entirely possible, but nothing I'm aware of though I'm not a source for any sort of legal information, it's all posturing gibberish to me. Either way, Gawker is now done, they have no way to recover from this and according to what I've read online Hogan's legal defense specifically targeted their attacks so that Gawker's insurance will not be liable to pay for the court costs under their contract with them, Gawker has the entire bill.

According to one article, they are going to try to do that exact retarded appeal pomegranate and they are "confident it will succeed", but then, I'm sure they were also confident they would win the case, and confident they could appeal it the first time around. Based on the person I saw in the trials...overwhelming positivity in the face of the inevitable can only get you so far, that man was stupid to an almost enlightening extent, like, I felt like I was on the verge of an epiphany about the nature of man or some pomegranate while I was watching him try to explain why hosting a sex video of a preteen is newsworthy if that child is a celebrity or the offspring of a celebrity; he radiated a powerful aura of stupid that was difficult to process.

edit: NOPE, I was wrong about the appeal denial. Like I said, I have no pineappleing idea what legal pomegranate means and was reading it incorrectly. The judge did not deny the appeal, they upheld the 140M fee. Which seems redundant.

--OK, I finally think I understand this pomegranate, basically this was denying a retrial? And that means they have to pay a 50M bond to put in an appeal because they can no longer do a retrial? Am I getting that right?