KhainiWest Wrote:You know, except the part where they have to come up with 50m to even challenge the decision
Really? The way assets generally work in big business, I seriously doubt they have that much in liquid form sitting around, the majority of their "money" is probably tied into the stock market, but based on what you do you know that already. They are screwed. I hope they try to challenge it too, just so they can lose again and be 165M in the toilet (or is that how it works? I'm legitimately not sure anymore). Did you see the part where the lawyer joked about posting celebrity nudes of 4 year olds then didn't even strike it from the record as a joke? Something like, "well, we would only go down to around 4 years old for that kind of thing *laughs*". They are pineappleing idiots on so many levels, there is no way they can win no matter how many times they challenge even if they -had- the money.
edit: here it is
http://nymag.com/following/2016/03/aj-da...trial.html
Quote: Q. Well, can you imagine a situation where a celebrity sex tape would not be newsworthy?Directly implying that anything above the age of 4 is newsworthy.
A. If they were a child.
Q. Under what age?
A. Four.

