Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
%att vs %damage, for marksmans?
#3
Ivangold Wrote:Which one is better? And what i really want know, and for marksmans? Makrsmans don't have much att so wouldn't be better %damage?Hurt

The amount of att you have is irrelevant to how effective %ATT is, so as long as you have at least 1 attack.

Marksman gain a lot of %TD (not all of them appear in your range) through their skills and assuming you have a few link skills related to %Boss and %TD, you should be focusing on %ATT. Your weapon potentials should be a good mixture of %ATT and %Boss.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-03, 05:32 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by xparasite9 - 2016-02-03, 05:41 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Liable - 2016-02-03, 06:03 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by hadriel - 2016-02-03, 06:11 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-03, 07:41 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Terebii - 2016-02-03, 08:20 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by MuscleWizard - 2016-02-04, 01:41 AM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-04, 10:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)