2016-02-03, 05:32 PM
Which one is better? And what i really want know, and for marksmans? Makrsmans don't have much att so wouldn't be better %damage?
|
%att vs %damage, for marksmans?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-03, 05:32 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by xparasite9 - 2016-02-03, 05:41 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Liable - 2016-02-03, 06:03 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by hadriel - 2016-02-03, 06:11 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-03, 07:41 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Terebii - 2016-02-03, 08:20 PM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by MuscleWizard - 2016-02-04, 01:41 AM
%att vs %damage, for marksmans? - by Ivangold - 2016-02-04, 10:57 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)