2015-11-03, 03:36 PM
SaptaZapta Wrote:I submitted two tickets, and both got the same sort of response I described above: "I agree, and I'll bring this up in discussion."
The more interesting thing is that one of the tickets was about allowing more chair bags to be used. A little while back, the MLC ran a survey regarding the choked inventory issue in general. I would hope that survey led to some kind of discussion, and possibly a resolution (although I may be too optimistic regarding the time-frame of MLC discussions). And yet I did not get an answer hinting that some other solution to the inventory issue was in the works, or any indication that the councilor even heard of the issue before.
This is kind of what prompted my question.
As for the site itself, it's obviously still not quite there. Logs you out and back in at random, broken links, random shape-shifting, etc. And of course no idea of its security, so don't use any credentials you use anywhere else (but that's always good practice). But the basic functionality of writing a message and getting a response to it (by email) seems to be working.
Ah, I see, I figured as much.
Zelkova Wrote:If the topic has been up for discussion we have been given the green light to acknowledge that it has been talked about. We cannot however state where it is within the system or if it has been approved or not yet. It's all very limiting.
Most of the responses should be mild or bland for now as we haven't had a meeting yet.
Give us a couple of days if you can. I'll see if we can update tickets with correspondence from the MLC about what we thought about each ticket during the meetings. (another grey area)
That's good, I think that'd be the most important feature one would want from this system.

