2015-08-31, 05:52 PM
Grey Wrote:I am just so critical of the MLC as a whole. To be frank, if all they'll be is another layer of opaque bureaucracy, what's the point in having them in the first place?
I, as well as others feel that the most qualified/mature person in the MLC is Zelkova. He's the only one I feel that is proactive and has a decent head on his shoulders and is going out of his way to try and do something with the MLC- ie making a site to show what they're discussing and such. I don't recall the name of it, otherwise I'd link it.
That being said, he hardly plays ms1...so that says something about the MLC as a whole.
Grey Wrote:I seem to get the impression that they want us to respect them and give them a chance, but that's something that must be earned. Why should I give them a chance if they haven't demonstrated to me that they can make changes, and then, not just changes but changes that I would like to see? That isn't to say they should do everything I want, but they should do something. I get that this is a volunteer position and all, but that shouldn't mean they only do things when convenient for them, this should be a major time investment. Doing volunteer work is generally a thankless job, they already shouldn't expect any different, however, this, basically being a volunteer politician, is going to be much worse. They cannot expect people not to make criticisms when their work is supposed to be in the interest of the public. If they don't have the time, or if they aren't doing what the majority wants, then it should be tough cookies, off the council.
This shouldn't be the cool kids club, if they want to stay, they should have to work to cater to the majority.
Have you seen this mess of a shadower thread on the subreddit? Who even thought this guy would make a good representative. It gave me a good, hardy laugh though.