2015-01-29, 11:55 PM
ShinkuDragon Wrote:i asked mainly because of this:
now, you can blame it on southperry, nexon, or my X amounts of years playing the game, but i'm going to be quite... pessimistic isn't the word but it's what comes to mind right now, i don't think it'll go that far, but hey, good luck proving me wrong i certainly wish you do.
as for the classes i have to agree with poetryisfail, dividing them as "adventurer warriors" and so instead of "DrK", "hero" and "pally" reps doesn't seem like a good idea to me, sure, less people is easier to manage but finding someone who really knows the strength and weaknesses of each class by heart isn't going to prove easy. especially when some classes in the same tree are very different skill-wise. i know my fair share of hero and pally stuff, but it's mainly theorycrafting from looking at skills and identifying how they should work best. certainly haven't geared either to do high level bossing and while i feel that what i know is certainly enough, it might just not be.
DrK on the other hand is the class i've been since day 1 of my maple adventure, i can nostalgia with the oldest and school the newest. i don't know heroes or pallies like the back of my hand like i do with my DrK.
Skeptical is the word you're looking for? I'm right there with ya, especially if there's no real influence on KMS developers.
I'll echo this and say that dividing by 1st jobs is a bad idea. While you can probably find people that are experts in say both BM and MM, you're only going to hurt yourself for the more diverse class branches like Warriors or Mages. Each 4th job is unique and deserves it's own slot.