Hostages taken in Sydney + bomb threat

whats the point of waiting for the inevitable in the case he did have bombs. what do you think waiting will do if he had bombs there. you think hes just gonna dis arm then while surrendering ? no hes not.

are you kidding me ? the police were too scared sif they want to take him alive rofl. the police went for the option which was the lowest risk for them where they wont be blamed for anything if it goes wrong since they got no balls. o lets wait for the guy to make the first move then we move in. thats the police response to this situation. if you are dealing with an armed man without reason what other option can there be besides shooting him or waiting for him to kill someone first which he did in this case

For the inevitable? What do you fucking mean? If his goal was to kill people he would've just done so, since he kept hostages he clearly had a goal in mind and this leads to the possibility that.... they can get everyone out without anyone dying! There's a possibility of negotiation, there have been multiple cases in the past where all hostages are saved through negotiating with the criminal.

Your method would've possibly just killed everyone while the the results of what actually DID happen resulted in most people surviving.

It has nothing to do with not having any balls and everything about the police's goal not being just killing him but the safety of the people inside.
This might seem like a FUCKING CRAZY AND WILD concept to you, but the police don't actually care of the gunman lives or dies, what they DO care about is the safety of the people inside, which was their priority. Crazy right? The police is worried about the lives of others, is this such a crazy concept to you?

Your line of thought would've possibly just killed everyone for the sake of killing a single madman. Like are you actually too dumb to understand the concept of bombs and accomplices?

>Shoot man keeping hostages while there's a threat of bombs and potential accomplices
>The accomplice blows up the bombs
>Everyone fucking dies and nothing is achieved

Like i seriously think you suffer from some kind of mental problem or lack of empathy if you think risking everyone's lives just to kill a single madman is the best thing to do in these situations.

Like seriously, what does just killing him right away when there's a risk it would kill everyone achieve?