2014-12-04, 12:38 PM
KhainiWest Wrote:http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/vi...historical
bwahahahhaha
Gawker you pineapple tard.
So wait, does that have to do with gawker specifically or just one retarded employee? I mean, they did post it on the website too, but is that gawker's fault? No question that the taper should be charged, they were taping stuff in "a private bedroom". Regardless of what was taped that's an offense, and doubly so because it was shared. Did gawker actually knowingly host it? I never saw the article in question.

