2014-10-27, 07:33 PM
Right from the moment that David asked her about the relevancy of the death threats to Gamergate (90% of tweets pretaining to her being neutral, 3% being positive, 7% negative and whatnot), you can see immediately that she jumped to the defensive, and from there remained throughout. He heard her side of the story, gave some factual background, and did not take side; David merely questioned the possibility of the two even corresponding to each other.
She claims that by publicizing the death threats that she forced certain journalism sites to take action. But did it really? Sites like Game Informer only spoke out because one of their writers were exposed while trying to lend support to Zoe Quinn. Completely irrelevant to Wu. And also lol at the internet connection problems and hiccups happening therein.
So after watching that, I wanna ask if anyone else thought that was a hit piece on Wu. Because being honest, I don't think it was for the reasons he concluded with.
She claims that by publicizing the death threats that she forced certain journalism sites to take action. But did it really? Sites like Game Informer only spoke out because one of their writers were exposed while trying to lend support to Zoe Quinn. Completely irrelevant to Wu. And also lol at the internet connection problems and hiccups happening therein.
So after watching that, I wanna ask if anyone else thought that was a hit piece on Wu. Because being honest, I don't think it was for the reasons he concluded with.