Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs
#2
Get the %attack one. %total stacks additively with %boss damage, and it's rather easy to accumulate %boss from set effects, link skills, potential, etc.

In your specific case, assuming you will use the other claw you will have 12% attack and 94% boss+total due to NL passives. The first secondary you mentioned will multiply your average damage output by (21+94+100)/(100+94)*(6+15+100)/(100+15) = 1.1661
while the second will multiply by (100+15+15)/(100+15) = 1.1304.

Right now, the first one is better for you, but if you plan on improving your other equips/set effects or getting the rest of your reinforce hyper skills and links then the second will be better.

I advise purchasing the second charm.

In general, people try to avoid %total damage potential lines in favor of %boss, %ignore defense, and %attack.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by qtipp - 2014-10-19, 11:32 PM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by xlxlxlxl - 2014-10-20, 12:08 AM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by ShinkuDragon - 2014-10-20, 12:49 AM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by Randomcity2 - 2014-12-03, 09:49 PM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by Rexaar - 2014-12-04, 03:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)