Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs
#1
So I am a bit confused here, some people say %total damage is better and some people say %att is better. I've stumbled upon 2 death sender charms (NL secondary).
One is 21% total damage 6%att the other is 15% attack. When I asked if I should buy the 21% total damage they said no because total damage acts like boss damage and it isn't that great for Night Lords since %att will be better, can someone help me decide which one will be better for me? If it helps I plan on buying a 21% total damage 12%att claw later.

Right now I have 513 attack
no %att and only 15% total damage from hypers
59% boss dmg

thanks
Reply


Messages In This Thread
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by qtipp - 2014-10-19, 11:32 PM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by xlxlxlxl - 2014-10-20, 12:08 AM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by ShinkuDragon - 2014-10-20, 12:49 AM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by Randomcity2 - 2014-12-03, 09:49 PM
%ATT vs Total Damage for NLs - by Rexaar - 2014-12-04, 03:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)