#Gamergate

Nice try, but alright. Whatever.

Let me ask you this, then.
What exactly do you want out of gamergate? Specifically, what do YOU want. What are you hoping to gain from this.
I don't want any videos, I don't want any articles. What do you want. What is so important to you here? And I don't want any broad general statements that don't really mean anything without context. "JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY! TRANSPARENCY!" doesn't exactly cut it.

And, as the child in me demands, *why?*

To be honest I was at work regarding all this and had to manage with whatever website wasn't blocked. The format was entirely screwed up as many things were blocked and mangled so I misread the article. After you pointed out those quotes were from different dates and not aligned how I saw them I knew I made a mistake, I just wanted to see how long you were willing to argue about it.

My goal of gamergate is to hold those as an example/accountable for attacking an entire readerbase with fallcies and a toxic ideology that is forcibly attempted to be injected. Websites have already started conforming and putting disclaimers (see steam/escapist), but until people like Leigh Alexander lose their job, I won't be satisfied. Those types of people have no place in any form of PR, they don't deserve to discuss my hobby or product, especially when they lie, cheat and f`uck around to get where they need to be. I can expect this in triple A companies, but not in indie game development where the consumers make the masses.
@Stereo;

Those posts were not deleted I edited them after a few minutes of thinking about whether it was worth it or not, no they weren't inflammatory or anything of that nature, I just felt continuing the discussion wasn't worth the effort.
[MENTION=3225]Jordan[/MENTION]; Can you confirm no posts have been deleted since it was you who came in