2014-10-13, 12:08 AM
Stereo Wrote:Funny, I see the holes on the other side of the argument than you do. I'm not playing devil's advocate or making up a hypothetical situation for the state of argument so the comic doesn't apply.
The fact that you don't even realize it makes it worse; at least some people can do something and know that what they are doing is wrong but believe they profit more from it than the other side would give them. Those people may be morally bankrupt, but at least they aren't ignorant. Many believe that a clever person is more dangerous than an idiot, I disagree; to give an example of this, which do you consider more dangerous, George W Bush or Clinton? Or, to give a less obvious example since I'm sure you are a liberal, Obama or Clinton? Which one has done irreparable damage to the world and the world's opinion of the US, and which was merely an opportunistic jackass that profited hugely off of everything, talked circles around his opposition, and even now still is considered an important person for public relations because of how he does things? Just stating the things they have done with zero opinions still seems to make that a weighted answer, and that's kind of my point. This is how I feel about SJWs; they are more dangerous BECAUSE they are ignorant of EVERYTHING that goes on around them, ignorant of all facts that do not coincide with their opinions, and ignorant of how entitlement and many, many other things actually work in the real world.

