2014-09-02, 01:10 PM
Niernen Wrote:Polantaris; While voting off an inactive may not be the best course of action, it is better than a no lynch, and when there is no one too suspicious it just usually fall on the inactives since no one can get a good read on them. So far the game itself hasn't been too active, but I noticed @Verrkol and @Metaseraphim haven't posted too much. (Neither has TheBirds, but people don't seem to call him out on that and he usually finds a way to avoid suspicion when he is inactive). With Meow removing his no lynch (although even if he was mafia he would probably still remove it to avoid suspicion) and some of the rest being random, I think I'll wait a bit longer before casting my vote.
If there ends up being absolutely no one who is suspicious, then I'm more for an inactive lynch...but that's almost never the case. Someone always raises suspicions a little in some way.
Shidoshi Wrote:I understand your reasoning going against LuvD's vote on meowmixx, but I don't think that's enough to be suspicious of him. As much as inactive lynching is generally bad D1, lynching LuvD on Day 1 is an "easy lynch" as well.
That's a good point. I was mostly trying to get things rolling since ABSOLUTELY NOTHING was happening.