2014-08-23, 06:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 2014-08-23, 06:33 PM by KhainiWest.)
What pisses me off most about BTA's statement is I literally can quote his ignorance from like 3 news sites that essentially have been misinforming the public about what really happened.
1) This was a contest where the only reason for participation was to present an idea. These are people who are aspiring, who don't have the power to code, the power to create (much like zoe quinn ironically). The winner would get their idea published to their image, get 8% of the royalties, and the rest to charity.
2) Zoe quinn protested stating that "It should be up to the female game developer to decide this!", as in, where the money goes (up to her to donate or not). The problem is, you're essentially doing the work for the winner, they literally present a good idea and bam, chance for dream coming true. The cost to do this doesn't disappear because they are doing a favor, it does however, mitigate a lot of the costs if they write off the profit/tools/software as a non-profit claim. I mean seriously, to come up with something as asinine as "THATS OPPRESSIVE", should piss off feminists everywhere. You had a company going through all the development hoops, putting it towards a good cause, and you still get a slight dip in the pot, just for presenting an idea. The fact it was smeared (via twitter, yes it was very smeared) by a so called "feminist", which in reality it's just a facade for a terrorist, to bully someones good cause. That is disgusting, and you are disgusting to even try to defend this trailer trash.
3) Lastly, the whole Transexual* thing is absolutely a ridiculous, uneducated criticism. Zoe had nothing to fall back on so she brought it up, just showing how "Pro LBGT" she is, stating the rules weren't fair. Yet the definition they used is the acceptable definition by the LGBT standard. They didn't make this rule/definition up, they applied it. It just shows how much value zoe quinn holds to these principles which she uses as a shield in order to bully others. Even now the mainstream media is writing her off as an innocent angel who's getting bullied for relationship problems.
No, she's getting pineappleing blown out for her ridiculous hypocrisy, for her poor character and obvious corruption based on her f-ucking cooter. "Oh but this is just part of the system, you guys don't care@!", what a crock of sh-it, you point out and shun obvious corruption not say "It's just in all a days work!". Such defeatist attitude is pitiful and exactly what our future generation doesn't need.
1) This was a contest where the only reason for participation was to present an idea. These are people who are aspiring, who don't have the power to code, the power to create (much like zoe quinn ironically). The winner would get their idea published to their image, get 8% of the royalties, and the rest to charity.
2) Zoe quinn protested stating that "It should be up to the female game developer to decide this!", as in, where the money goes (up to her to donate or not). The problem is, you're essentially doing the work for the winner, they literally present a good idea and bam, chance for dream coming true. The cost to do this doesn't disappear because they are doing a favor, it does however, mitigate a lot of the costs if they write off the profit/tools/software as a non-profit claim. I mean seriously, to come up with something as asinine as "THATS OPPRESSIVE", should piss off feminists everywhere. You had a company going through all the development hoops, putting it towards a good cause, and you still get a slight dip in the pot, just for presenting an idea. The fact it was smeared (via twitter, yes it was very smeared) by a so called "feminist", which in reality it's just a facade for a terrorist, to bully someones good cause. That is disgusting, and you are disgusting to even try to defend this trailer trash.
3) Lastly, the whole Transexual* thing is absolutely a ridiculous, uneducated criticism. Zoe had nothing to fall back on so she brought it up, just showing how "Pro LBGT" she is, stating the rules weren't fair. Yet the definition they used is the acceptable definition by the LGBT standard. They didn't make this rule/definition up, they applied it. It just shows how much value zoe quinn holds to these principles which she uses as a shield in order to bully others. Even now the mainstream media is writing her off as an innocent angel who's getting bullied for relationship problems.
No, she's getting pineappleing blown out for her ridiculous hypocrisy, for her poor character and obvious corruption based on her f-ucking cooter. "Oh but this is just part of the system, you guys don't care@!", what a crock of sh-it, you point out and shun obvious corruption not say "It's just in all a days work!". Such defeatist attitude is pitiful and exactly what our future generation doesn't need.