#Gamergate

Was wondering when this would show up. So: he's lying, or at the very least very confused. Literally all she did was question why they wanted to own the rights and give the money to charity when actually giving both to the women would go along better with their intended purpose (and because working for free/exposure is, uh, bad), along with pointing out to them that their rule about trans women (which has apparently since been changed since) was weirdly/overly restrictive. She made like 5 tweets total about it and then did nothing else. That's all. A few, non-attacking tweets. Dude's just blaming her for all the people who saw her question that stuff and then agreed that it wasn't a good idea. I mean, if someone else then spontaneously did those things to him because they saw her tweets, I guess you could see it as technically being her fault in a weird disconnected overall cosmic sense, but she sure didn't tell them or encourage them to do it.

And this is why you should never enter these threads, because you're entirely too uneducated to give a worthwhile opinion. Everything in this paragraph is false, and has been clarified and over explained over a dozen times, in multiple places. If you aren't smart enough to actually take a 2 minute google search to see how asinine you look right now, more entertainment for the rest of the people here.

Phil fish/Zoe quinn are terrible people who's careers deserve to be outright stripped from them.